Unfortunately Peter Lynds is neither a hoax nor a genius.
However, I say so because the question is not what is Peter Lynds but rather WHY is Peter Lynds?
Like every entertainment, the world is sick of the politically elevated clerk into a divinity, and they had enough of time travel hoax, and all the bizarre consequences of time deformation that makes no sense anyway.
That is why, while the Church of Einstein shall defend its existence relentlessly and annihilate Peter Lynds in the process, the world's mind shall be prepared for the scientific revolution.
Peter Lynds claims that time is an illusion, but by the same and exact criterion with which he comes to this conclusion, what isn't?
The fact is that all dimensions are nothing but illusions, and I already claimed that on my old site on the year 1994.
The Newtonian concept was to accept the illusion as our best conception of our reality. Out of this we arbitrate relatively absolute standards, with which we finally barter.
Einstein, as a rebel who revolted against the German racism and ethnic oppression of his people, was used by the Zionist movement to throw a killing weapon at the German belligerence towards the Jews. All the press and the economic power at hand was used to favour Einstein and present him the the world as an unequalled genius.
Since then, Einstein became a legacy, the image of whom was enforced by every hypocrite or social-climbing-ignorant, as well as the dead fish floating in the mainstream, who fear the prosecution of those who earn their living by teaching the fantasy.
In that fallacious course of the last century, the illusion was doubled rather than eliminated.
The press, emphasizes on empirical verifications in which all laymen have no word and some professionals are fended off or prosecuted if they ever doubted the experimental results. Then where is the truth!
How can a big bang be a proof of anything if we have no direct sense of it!
How can black holes mean anything if artists do not illustrate the effects imagined by the profitable entities?
My clock stopped the other day, so what shall I do, jump into a parallel dimension to fetch my running clock!
A clock may slow down for one of several reasons or more, but we may only realise that it slowed down because we are aware of the true time to which it slowed comparatively. Then Newton must have been correct, and the last century was a waste of time (Pun Intended).
The Lynds phenomenon is because something must be wrong. Something is not answered yet.
I have been working since 1971 on the emergent order sets that emerge of out of chaos.
Chaos is inherently dynamic, and dynamics imply motion as an effect of forces related by indistinguishable relations of change of state. That is the chaotic background out of which new relations emerge to be distinguished as order by the accumulation of the insignificant into a summed significant order. It is that transition from state to state that carries the illusion of a temporal limit.
Our biological complexity is founded on the natural evolution of existence and we carry the same rules inside our brains. Since we are obviously dynamic and contain regular transitions of states in the wave functions of our brains, then we must have an inherent feeling of the time illusion.
Newton's concepts of absolute time is in fact founded on his postulate that the universal time is homogenous, because without homogeneity time may not be absolute. Einstein did not falsify Newton's Postulate but he replaced it completely by another by rejecting the universality of time and adopting the multitude of local time scales. Therefore Newton was not wrong and neither was the clownish assertions of Lorentz and Einstein about length and time dimensional deformations. The secret is in the nature of Aether, that when empirically exposed shall shut up all the loud voices. Aether is a homogenous chaos, and our technologies did not reach the level of probing that quality of Aether. The only exposed feature is the constancy of the speed of light relative to a not "locally-accelerated-source". This must infer that the speed of light is inertial as much as its source or that its speed is _c_ relative to its inertial source. Einstein's mistake is one of generalisation (pun intended). He took the constancy of the speed of light to its inertial source to apply to an inertial observer, which is logically impossible unless the relative velocity between the source and the observer was ZERO. The consequence was obviously a deformation of length and time scales, which is absurd and that is why paradoxes and fantasies came forth.
Newton was correct but incomplete. Einstein was complete but incorrect. Lynds is neither complete nor correct.
Now if you will excuse me, I have a lot of work to do. _________________ Hemetis
Hoax and I'll tell you why. Time is not an illusion it is a physically measurable quantity. It goes at different rates when there is motion or gravity. If it wasn't a physical quantity it wouldn't belong to physics.
Time moves forward in every (curved) direction.
Its arrow is only one way. The direction of time is not a relative thing.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
News
Predictions
Community
Links and Downloads
![[Valid RSS]](http://www.zapfuture.com/images/valid-rss.GIF "Validate my RSS feed")
![[Valid Atom 0.3]](http://www.zapfuture.com/images/valid-atom.GIF "Validate my Atom 0.3 feed")