| Author |
Message |
| < Science ~ How about if Time had more than 1 dimension? |
|
Posted:
Tue Feb 07, 2006 11:30 pm
|
|
|
Moderator
Joined: Jun 21, 2005
Posts: 279
|
|
| Time slows down in gravity. Einstein said: the patterns of curved space-time around mass are absolute. This is one dimension of time changing. Stephen Hawking has proposed Imaginary Time that runs at right angles to the real time as decribed by Einstein. From his point of view there would be two dimensions of time curving the universe in the 4th dimension. |
|
|
|
 |
|
Posted:
Thu Feb 09, 2006 5:44 pm
|
|
|
Newbie

Joined: Jan 19, 2006
Posts: 4
|
|
Time Belongs to the Mind, Motion Belongs to the Universe
In science we experience motion with the rational mind. Scientific mind uses "time" as a main frame into which all physical phenomena are examined. Time as a frame of the mind (we will call it "mind-time frame") was build up by observing motion. To have a rational understanding of the events in the nature human mind has developed "mind-time frame" that is composed out of past, present and future.
In the universe time does not exists, there is no evidence about time. All we observe is motion. We experience motion into the "mind-time frame", we project time into the universe.
By observing (watching, witnessing) the mind we become distinguish between motion and time, we become aware that motion runs into what Einstein calls NOW.
……... there is something essential about the "now" which is outside the realm of science. Albert Einstein
the speed of motion depends on the curvature of space.
see more:
http://forum.physorg.com/index.php?showtopic=4321 |
|
|
|
 |
|
Posted:
Fri Feb 10, 2006 1:30 am
|
|
|
Newbie

Joined: Nov 09, 2004
Posts: 3
|
|
Time can't have multiple dimensions because time does not change. Spatial velocity is given as dx/dt. Velocity in time(dt/dt) is nonsensical. As simple as that. In other words, no time travel to the past or the future, no motion in space-time, no wormholes and no hanky-panky with your great, great grandmother. There is only the changing present, aka the NOW. Distance is an illusion and we'll be able to travel instantly from anywhere to anywhere.
Read here:
http://www.rebelscience.org/Crackpots/notorious.htm
http://www.rebelscience.org/Crackpots/nasty.htm |
|
|
|
 |
|
Posted:
Sun Feb 12, 2006 2:06 am
|
|
|
Moderator
Joined: Jun 21, 2005
Posts: 279
|
|
| amrit wrote: |
Time Belongs to the Mind, Motion Belongs to the Universe
In science we experience motion with the rational mind. Scientific mind uses "time" as a main frame into which all physical phenomena are examined. Time as a frame of the mind (we will call it "mind-time frame") was build up by observing motion. To have a rational understanding of the events in the nature human mind has developed "mind-time frame" that is composed out of past, present and future.
In the universe time does not exists, there is no evidence about time. All we observe is motion. We experience motion into the "mind-time frame", we project time into the universe.
By observing (watching, witnessing) the mind we become distinguish between motion and time, we become aware that motion runs into what Einstein calls NOW.
……... there is something essential about the "now" which is outside the realm of science. Albert Einstein
the speed of motion depends on the curvature of space.
see more:
http://forum.physorg.com/index.php?showtopic=4321 |
If time does not exist how can we measure it? |
|
|
|
 |
|
Posted:
Sun Feb 19, 2006 9:49 pm
|
|
|
Apprentice

Joined: Aug 03, 2005
Posts: 10
Location: U.S.
|
|
I don't know if one can travel through time. (I'll say that first so you don't criticize me). What I do know is that time is only the measurement of movement at what speed. If you cannot measure time you cannot measure speed (45 miles/HOUR). Thus time is a form of measurement.
Movement is the ability to go from one part of a dimension to another. Thus, it is a possibility that there is a dimension of movement. That might be what they confuse with time. _________________ If we do not learn from our mistakes, there is no point in having them. |
|
|
|
 |
|
Posted:
Wed Feb 22, 2006 11:43 pm
|
|
|
Moderator
Joined: Jun 21, 2005
Posts: 279
|
|
| Look at movement. It can change. If movement itself is a dimension then it is a dynamic one. |
|
|
|
 |
|