stem cell research, not without human embryo destruction - Society Forum

Addict Joined: Aug 04, 2005 Posts: 69

http://today.reuters.co.uk/News/NewsArticle.aspx?type=scienceNews&storyID=2005-08-22T181927Z_01_DIT221123_RTRIDST_0_SCIENCE-CELLS-DC.XML

I thought the whole point of the debate was to remove human embryos completely. I also thought that it was illegal to clone humans. It sounds to me like the reporters who are touting this have it wrong.

This article says that they are still using human eggs, placing an adult cell nucleus into it (hence the first stage of cloning a human because the cell immediately begins to divide as a developing embryo) and then they stop the process and remove the stem cells.

Addict Joined: Aug 04, 2005 Posts: 69

Maybe I should clarify. The stories are being headlined as

Moderator Joined: Jun 21, 2005 Posts: 279

Science has found other stem cells with embryonic potential besides the embryonic. One would be primitive stem cells from adult blood. I have also heard that umbilical cord stem cells can be used. We have many options to an immoral one.

Mentor Joined: Jun 21, 2005 Posts: 94

Moderator Joined: Jun 21, 2005 Posts: 279

You lousy atheist.

They give mother the choice to kill her baby and tell her its women's rights! That baby belongs to the father.

Addict Joined: Aug 04, 2005 Posts: 69

You might think so, but the problem is too many men abandon their responsibility. The courts have sided with mothers for years. The problem is, is it women's rights or the unborn child's rights. When a woman become pregnant, the courts have always assumed the mother had the child's and her best interests in mind. Nowadays, the mother probably has selfish motives in mind.

Women's rights are all fine and good, but we also have to realize that men and women are different, and should be treated differently. Mothers have the obligation of carrying the future of mankind for 9 months, and then caring for them for at least a while until they can take care of themselves. Instead women want it all, a family and a wonderful career. These two things are usually somewhat exclusive of each other.

Moderator Joined: Jun 21, 2005 Posts: 279

Yes cwes the mother's rights have been promoted over the father's. This is the problem. I believe fathers are more important than mothers. Even having a bad father is better than no father at all.

Mothers have been given the political rights to undermine the fathers. It is no wonder American families are falling apart. Who is going to correct the women? If you can't correct your wife you can't correct the children. You don't have the moral high ground. -- Take it back you men!

Who do you think has promoted mothers over fathers? and for what purpose?
The Russians knew that they could use the techniques that they conquered their own masses with on America.
In their Textbook on Psychopolitics written in the 1920's the Russians said they would conquer America without firing a shot by promoting the disentigration of the family in exactly this way. Russia's plan for America has been achieved through the left wing democrats. Its a sad story but something that we need to deal with. Where is a Godly man like Ronald Reagan? We need another one.

The communists know how to disintegrate a society in order to rule it. Our problems(in America) are by design and the politicians are willing dupes. Evil is by design.

Addict Joined: Aug 04, 2005 Posts: 69

· Encyclopaedia · Wikipedia

· Encyclopaedia
· Wikipedia