Physics Challenged - Breakthroughs in Science Forum

Expert Joined: Nov 17, 2004 Posts: 158 Location: Egypt

Physics is a science of measurements, without which physics is crippled.
Measurements ascertained by comparison with a standard.
Kinematics as a fundamental branch of physics is concerned with motion.
Motion is generally described by two most fundamental dimensions, which are time and length.
To measure time and length there must be an arbitrated standard that enjoys a maximal confidence, and to which comparisons are made.
This means that a measurement would be crude or imprecise or even wrong if the measurer fails to be precise when executing the comparison to an undoubtedly precise standard that not only enjoys a maximal confidence in such precision but that such standard is durable and invariant whenever a measurement was made.
Then, by definition, an "unconfident standard" or "uncertain standard" are Oxymoronic expressions with inherent contradiction built in from start.
Confidence and certainty are not absolute concepts but rather scale-dependant and significantly judged.
It is not uncommon to hear expressions such as "The degree of confidence" or "The degree of certainty".
Scientists relentlessly seek the highest resolution to increase precision to a limit beyond which the remaining fractional variance must be insignificant.
However, an extra effort to invade the insignificant zone with extra precision pays off when addition and multiplication operations take place moving the insignificant figures into the zone of significance.
This trend is not just a human invention but also a natural process with which order emerges from chaos as a persistent pattern.
In everyday life, bartering or exchanging value, involves a counting operation that might involve measurements.
Crude measurements are usually satisfactory, but when it comes to scientific experiments, the context dictates the boundary that separates significant quantities from insignificant quantities.
The classical laws of physics, set by Newton and Galileo and the scientists of the eighteenth and the nineteenth centuries were absolutely satisfactory and sufficient for the majority of the phenomena being measured.
A turn-point experiment was to test the hypothesis that the material of planet earth moved through an Aether like a sieve in does water, and such a speed must be obviously relative such that one could be able to measure the speed of the water through the sieve and consequently the Aether through material objects.

To measure such a hypothetical relative speed demanded a standard measure of length and a standard measure of time (By definition must be invariant under any circumstances).

By the standards available to Michelson and Morley then, the experiment yielded a NULL.
The scientists then were divided into two factions, one that insisted that Aether must exist and that length and time standards under that specific context must have been variant (Lorentz-Einstein SR), while the other faction took the result to be a negation of the existence of Aether as a hypothesis altogether while confirming certainty and confidence in the standards of time and length as arbitrated absolutes (Not Relative).
To make this very clear, we should know that Lorentz-Einstein SR was not quite welcome at the beginning by the empiricists who would never trade their certainty and confidence in the arbitrated standard length and time for anything. Those empiricists accepted the MMx as an empirical proof that Aether does not exist and that Lorentz and Einstein are clownish dreamers who are fabricating a theory of length and time variance to cling on to the Aether hypothesis.
Einstein is known to have gone a long way with the analogy of a box that contained a well defined coordinate space that must continue to exist even after removing the walls of the box one after the other leaving only a point.
Expressions such as vacuum and empty-space were replacements of choice to decrease the strong opposition of a continued belief in Aether, but the variance of length (contraction) and time (dilation) remained as a screaming evidence that relativity is founded on the Aether Hypothesis.

We all know that a relatively moving Aether was empirically disproved, and as a consequence the Lorentz-Einstein SR must be hogwash that was specifically invented to justify the NULL result while keeping Aether as a relatively moving medium.
At the beginning of the twentieth century neither the theory of chaos nor the fractals algebra was theorised yet.
Thus, there was no third alternative to reconcile both sides' logic. We may not belittle either factions of great scientists, hence we must find another explanation for the NULL result to keep the standard time and length as certain arbitrations while finding the true nature of Aether, which is the inevitable medium for light waves' propagation.
The Quantum Field Theory, which evolved into Spinors Theory, when combined with the Theory of Chaos can explain very clearly how a chaotic medium is nonexistent until induced fluctuations instil order to emerge from that chaos. This means that Aether has no state of its own other than the nondeterministic chaos, and when light propagates through Aether, it is so by inducing the Orderly fluctuations in the Chaotic Spinors.
This hypothesis, explains the NULL, redefines the Aether and keeps the arbitrated standards as invariant absolutes.
The concept of speed is meaningless without a relative spatial reference from which distance can be measured.
Yes, the propagation medium as its constants that modify the velocity of the wave when fixing its wavelength and frequency as produced, but due to the relative state of motion of the observer, there can be no experience other than a frequency shift over the absolute time interval in which the cycles are being counted.
The essence of frequency is a ratio between geometric time (being counted in units of complete cycles of change of state) and the standard arbitration of an absolute time (such as the second).
Then frequency when rigorously examined is in fact a dimensionless ratio, which is a quantity of A-Type-Units within a quantity of B-Type-Units.
The A-Type-Units, being geometric, correspond to a spatially evolved hyper-dimension, such as a wavelength.
The B-Type-Units, being absolute, correspond to an arbitrated standard, such as the second of time.
This means, that while we may consider frequency to be dimensionless as being time per time, we may also consider frequency to be a speed when we consider the relation to be wavelengths per time.
However, the inverse of frequency must be a time interval only because then it would be the measure of the geometrical temporal duration of the cycle of interaction, or the the temporal duration in which the hyper-dimension evolved spatially.
We may conclude that time is a pseudo-dimension the units of which quantify a dimensionless ratio.
Then, we should realise that a dimensionless ratio such as v/c must be in fact [L/L], which is a comparative measure between the displacement traversed by a body and the displacement traversed by light during the same unit of time. This means that the displacement of light during one unit of absolute time is the yardstick of length units to which the displacement of a body is being compared. It is _That_ yardstick, which appears in the tau-charts of the 4D Minkowski space coordinate system.
Since there is no motion that can be relative to emptiness, or even a chaotic Aether, the speed of light c must be relative to its source, but when it interacts with the observer it cannot be a constant any more.
This must be true given no postulates to defy, because using the source of light as a reference means that the speed of light is _c_ relative to that reference as much as the observer of the light is moving relative to the that same source. Then both speeds (light and observer) interact by their velocities in the coordinate space of the source.
Now the question is what happens when such velocities are added or subtracted as inline-components of vectors?
The wavelength is an immaterial invariant but it is defined by both, the fluctuation frequency at the source and the constants of propagation of the medium. However, the number of quantum actions from wave onto the observer is counted as a frequency. Therefore a frequency shift between source and observer is precisely an expression of the relative inline-component of velocities between light and observer.
Imagine a tiny surfer to ride a wave in a bond caused by a pebble. The frequency depends on the acceleration of the pebble and its velocity on entering the surface of the water, but the wave speed is a property of water and the wavelength is the ratio between the surface speed of the wave and its frequency. Then the tiny surfer will experience one continuous force in the radial direction as long as he rides a single wave and will move with the speed of the wave. On the other hand, if a tiny motorboat moved fast to the centre of the wave then the tiny rider of the tiny motorboat will experience more waves per second than frequently generated.
Since the device used by Michelson had co-moving parts then no relative velocities existed between the light and the device parts other than _c_, hence the NULL result.
Now that you know that Aether exists, and that standard units of time and length are invariant while the inline component of relative velocity between light and observers as not a constant, what shall you do?
_________________
Hemetis

Newbie Joined: Jun 23, 2005 Posts: 4

You need to learn to limit your posts. I'm sorry, but 5 pages of text is not easy on the eyes. I'm sure you can say what you want to in less space. I obviously didn't read all that (yet), but from the looks of it, I think you're on the right track.

· Encyclopaedia · Wikipedia

· Encyclopaedia
· Wikipedia